← Back to Taxonomy
FFN-14 · Functional Field Note

Frozen Recognition

Domain:
Confidence: Observed
Status: Draft

What It Looks Like in the Wild

Teams acknowledge the need for standardized decision-making protocols. Recognition of the problem persists without structural change to address it.

## Trigger Signals

  • Problem acknowledged in multiple meetings
  • "We should standardize this" repeated quarterly
  • Recognition persists without action
  • Same fix proposed, never implemented

## Why It Persists

Recognition feels like progress. Implementation is costly and disruptive. Acknowledging the problem is easier than solving it.

## Common Misdiagnosis

  • "We need to prioritize this"
  • "It's on the roadmap"
  • "We're waiting for the right time"
  • "We need more resources"

## Cost of Ignoring

The same problems recur. Teams lose faith that recognition leads to change. Learned helplessness sets in. People stop raising issues.

Trigger Signals

  • Problem acknowledged in multiple meetings
  • "We should standardize this" repeated quarterly
  • Recognition persists without action
  • Same fix proposed, never implemented

## Why It Persists

Recognition feels like progress. Implementation is costly and disruptive. Acknowledging the problem is easier than solving it.

## Common Misdiagnosis

  • "We need to prioritize this"
  • "It's on the roadmap"
  • "We're waiting for the right time"
  • "We need more resources"

## Cost of Ignoring

The same problems recur. Teams lose faith that recognition leads to change. Learned helplessness sets in. People stop raising issues.

Why It Persists

Recognition feels like progress. Implementation is costly and disruptive. Acknowledging the problem is easier than solving it.

## Common Misdiagnosis

  • "We need to prioritize this"
  • "It's on the roadmap"
  • "We're waiting for the right time"
  • "We need more resources"

## Cost of Ignoring

The same problems recur. Teams lose faith that recognition leads to change. Learned helplessness sets in. People stop raising issues.

Reality

The problem is seen. The solution is known. Implementation never happens. Recognition becomes a substitute for action.

## What It Looks Like In the Wild

Teams acknowledge the need for standardized decision-making protocols. Recognition of the problem persists without structural change to address it.

## Trigger Signals

  • Problem acknowledged in multiple meetings
  • "We should standardize this" repeated quarterly
  • Recognition persists without action
  • Same fix proposed, never implemented

## Why It Persists

Recognition feels like progress. Implementation is costly and disruptive. Acknowledging the problem is easier than solving it.

## Common Misdiagnosis

  • "We need to prioritize this"
  • "It's on the roadmap"
  • "We're waiting for the right time"
  • "We need more resources"

## Cost of Ignoring

The same problems recur. Teams lose faith that recognition leads to change. Learned helplessness sets in. People stop raising issues.

Common Misdiagnosis

  • "We need to prioritize this"
  • "It's on the roadmap"
  • "We're waiting for the right time"
  • "We need more resources"

## Cost of Ignoring

The same problems recur. Teams lose faith that recognition leads to change. Learned helplessness sets in. People stop raising issues.

Cost of Ignoring

The same problems recur. Teams lose faith that recognition leads to change. Learned helplessness sets in. People stop raising issues.

A functional field note. Observational, not prescriptive. · DRI™ Coherence Taxonomy