Trust Exhaustion
Definition
Repeated misalignment, broken signals, and unresolved structural failures deplete trust faster than it can be rebuilt. People continue to comply, but belief collapses. Engagement becomes mechanical, and discretionary effort disappears.
What Fails
Belief that the system will respond rationally to truth.
Why It Emerges
Trust erodes when people repeatedly provide signal without observing correction. Over time, silence becomes adaptive behavior.
How It Hides
- Stable performance metrics
- Reduced conflict
- "Mature" acceptance of constraints
- Polite alignment with no advocacy
Calm replaces commitment.
What It Gets Mistaken For
- Fatigue
- Cynicism
- Generational disengagement
- Lack of motivation
These explanations personalize what is structural.
Early Warning Signals
- People stop escalating known risks
- "Whatever you decide" replaces debate
- Feedback becomes vague or performative
- High performers disengage quietly
- Leaders hear "everything's fine" more often
Common Misdiagnoses
- "People are burned out"
- "We have an engagement problem"
- "This is morale-related"
- "The team is change-resistant"
- "We need recognition or incentives"
Fatal misread: Trust is treated as an emotional state instead of a systemic outcome.
What Actually Interrupts It
- Visible correction following escalation
- Leaders absorbing cost personally
- Reversal of a bad decision with acknowledgment
- Proof that truth changes outcomes
Trust returns only when systems demonstrate learning, not listening.
Recovery Condition
Trust rebuilt through constraint removal, not rhetoric.
Fail-Safe Default
Cease new asks. No additional commitments.
Cascade Relationships
Upstream: FM-14 Narrative Collapse, FM-10 Leadership Saturation, FM-03 Responsibility Without Authority